Document Control
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2025-10-31 | Project Management Office | Initial version |
Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Quality Management Approach
- Quality Standards & Metrics
- Testing Strategy
- Quality Gates & Milestones
- QA Team Organization
- Defect Management
- Code Review Process
- Quality Assurance vs Quality Control
- Performance & Load Testing
- Security Testing
- Acceptance Criteria
- Quality Metrics & Reporting
- Tools & Infrastructure
- Continuous Improvement
- Appendices
Executive Summary
Purpose
This Quality Management Plan establishes the quality standards, processes, and procedures for the KODA Multi-Tenant Beauty & Wellness Platform project. It ensures that all deliverables meet defined quality criteria and that the final product is reliable, secure, performant, and user-friendly.
Scope
This plan covers quality management for all 7 KODA applications:
- KODA Backend (API) - Laravel 12, PHP 8.2+
- KODA Mobile App - Flutter (iOS/Android)
- KODA Team App - Flutter (iOS/Android)
- KODA Website - ReactJS
- KODA CORE Admin - ReactJS
- KODA AI Engine - Laravel (AI/ML)
- KODA WebSocket Service - EMQX
Quality Objectives
| Objective | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Code Quality | > 80% coverage (Backend/API) | Automated code coverage tools |
| Defect Density | < 5 defects per 1000 LOC | Defect tracking system |
| API Response Time | < 200ms (p95) | Performance monitoring |
| Page Load Time | < 2 seconds | Lighthouse audits |
| Uptime | 99.9% | Server monitoring |
| Security Vulnerabilities | 0 critical, < 5 high | Security scanning tools |
| User Acceptance | > 90% approval | UAT feedback |
| Test Coverage | 100% critical paths | Test management system |
Quality Investment
- Total QA Hours: 488 hours
- QA Team: 1 QA Tester (dedicated)
- Security Testing: 66 hours (dedicated)
- Performance Testing: 16 hours
- Phase Distribution:
- Phase 1: 236 hours
- Phase 2: 82 hours
- Phase 3: 170 hours
Quality Management Approach
Quality Philosophy
The KODA project adopts a "Quality by Design" approach:
- Prevention over Detection - Build quality into the process from the start
- Continuous Testing - Test early, test often, test continuously
- Risk-Based Testing - Prioritize testing based on business impact and technical risk
- Automation First - Automate repetitive tests to improve efficiency and consistency
- Multi-Layered Defense - Multiple testing layers (unit, integration, system, UAT, security)
Quality Methodology
Agile-Hybrid Quality Approach:
- Sprint-Level Quality: Testing integrated into 2-week sprints
- Phase-Level Quality: Major testing milestones at phase boundaries
- Continuous Quality: Automated tests run on every commit
- Progressive Quality: Quality gates at key milestones prevent defects from propagating
Quality Standards & Metrics
1. Code Quality Standards
Backend (Laravel)
Standards: - PSR-12 coding standard - Laravel best practices - SOLID principles - DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) Metrics: - Code coverage: > 80% - Cyclomatic complexity: < 10 per method - Class size: < 500 lines - Method size: < 50 lines - Code duplication: < 5% Tools: - PHPStan (static analysis) - PHP_CodeSniffer - PHPUnit (testing) - PHPMD (mess detector)
Frontend (React)
Standards: - ESLint (Airbnb style guide) - TypeScript strict mode - Component-driven development - Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA) Metrics: - Code coverage: > 70% - Bundle size: < 500KB (gzipped) - Lighthouse score: > 90 (Performance, SEO, Accessibility) - Type coverage: 100% Tools: - ESLint - Prettier - Jest (testing) - React Testing Library - TypeScript compiler
Mobile (Flutter)
Standards: - Dart style guide - Flutter best practices - Clean architecture - Material Design / Cupertino guidelines Metrics: - Code coverage: > 70% - Widget test coverage: 100% critical flows - App size: < 50MB - Startup time: < 2 seconds Tools: - Dart analyzer - Flutter test - Integration test suite
2. Performance Standards
| Application | Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backend API | Response time (p95) | < 200ms | APM tools (New Relic/DataDog) |
| Response time (p99) | < 500ms | APM tools | |
| Throughput | > 1000 req/min | Load testing | |
| Error rate | < 0.1% | Monitoring logs | |
| Website | First Contentful Paint | < 1.5s | Lighthouse |
| Largest Contentful Paint | < 2.5s | Lighthouse | |
| Time to Interactive | < 3.0s | Lighthouse | |
| Cumulative Layout Shift | < 0.1 | Lighthouse | |
| Mobile Apps | App startup time | < 2s | Firebase Performance |
| Screen transition | < 300ms | Manual testing | |
| API call latency | < 1s | Network inspector | |
| Database | Query time (p95) | < 50ms | Slow query log |
| Connection pool | < 80% utilization | DB monitoring |
3. Security Standards
| Category | Standard | Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication | Multi-factor (OTP) | OWASP ASVS Level 2 |
| Authorization | Role-based access control (RBAC) | OWASP ASVS Level 2 |
| Data Encryption | TLS 1.3, AES-256 | PCI DSS compliant |
| Password Storage | bcrypt (cost factor 12) | OWASP guidelines |
| Session Management | Secure tokens, HttpOnly cookies | OWASP guidelines |
| Input Validation | Whitelist validation | OWASP Top 10 |
| SQL Injection | Parameterized queries only | OWASP Top 10 |
| XSS Prevention | Content Security Policy | OWASP Top 10 |
| CSRF Protection | Token-based | OWASP Top 10 |
4. Accessibility Standards
| Standard | Level | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| WCAG 2.1 | AA | All web applications |
| Color Contrast | 4.5:1 (normal text) | All UI elements |
| Keyboard Navigation | 100% navigable | All interactive elements |
| Screen Reader | Compatible (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver) | All content |
| Mobile Accessibility | TalkBack, VoiceOver support | Mobile apps |
Testing Strategy
Testing Pyramid
/\
/ \
/ E2E\ ← 10% (Manual + Automated)
/______\
/ \
/Integration\ ← 30% (Automated)
/____________\
/ \
/ Unit Tests \ ← 60% (Automated)
/__________________\
1. Unit Testing
Objective: Test individual components/functions in isolation
Coverage:
- Backend: > 80% line coverage
- Frontend: > 70% line coverage
- Mobile: > 70% line coverage
Tools:
- Backend: PHPUnit
- React: Jest + React Testing Library
- Flutter: Flutter Test
Responsibility: Developers (TDD approach)
Frequency: On every commit (CI/CD)
Examples:
- User authentication logic
- Payment calculation functions
- Points calculation engine
- Input validation functions
- Business rule enforcement
2. Integration Testing
Objective: Test interactions between components/modules
Coverage:
- All API endpoints: 100%
- Critical integration points: 100%
- Third-party integrations: 100%
Tools:
- Backend: PHPUnit (Feature tests)
- API: Postman/Newman
- Frontend: Jest + Mock Service Worker
Responsibility: Developers + QA Tester
Frequency: Daily (automated)
Examples:
- API authentication flow
- Payment gateway integration
- SMS gateway integration
- Database transactions
- WebSocket pub/sub
3. System Testing
Objective: Test complete end-to-end user flows
Coverage:
- All user stories: 100%
- All critical paths: 100%
- All screens/pages: 100%
Tools:
- Web: Selenium/Cypress
- Mobile: Appium
- API: Postman Collections
Responsibility: QA Tester
Frequency: Weekly + Before each milestone
Examples:
- Complete booking flow (customer app)
- Golden Opportunity booking + payment
- Customer registration + verification
- Staff check-in flow
- POS transaction processing
4. User Acceptance Testing (UAT)
Objective: Validate business requirements with actual users
Coverage:
- All Phase 1 features: 100%
- All Phase 2 features: 100%
- All Phase 3 features: 100%
Participants:
- 5-10 real customers (for Mobile App)
- 5-10 staff members (for Team App)
- 3-5 admin users (for KODA CORE)
Responsibility: Product Owner + QA Tester
Frequency: End of each phase
Success Criteria:
- > 90% user approval rating
- < 10 major issues identified
- All critical issues resolved before launch
5. Security Testing
Objective: Identify and remediate security vulnerabilities
Total Hours: 66 hours across 3 phases
Coverage:
- OWASP Top 10: 100%
- Authentication/Authorization: 100%
- Multi-tenant isolation: 100%
- Data protection: 100%
5.1 Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Tools:
- Backend: PHPStan, Psalm
- Frontend: ESLint security plugins, Snyk
- Mobile: Dart analyzer, Flutter analyze
Frequency: On every commit (automated)
Responsibility: Developers + DevOps
5.2 Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Tools:
- OWASP ZAP
- Burp Suite
- SQLMap (SQL injection)
- Nessus/OpenVAS
Frequency: Weekly + Before each milestone
Responsibility: QA Tester + External Security Consultant (optional)
Tests:
- Penetration testing
- Vulnerability scanning
- Brute-force attack simulation
- Session hijacking attempts
- Multi-tenant data isolation verification
5.3 Security Test Schedule
| Phase | Hours | Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 30 | Authentication, Authorization, Multi-tenant isolation, Payment security |
| Phase 2 | 16 | Loyalty system, Passport QR codes, Promo codes, Partner data isolation |
| Phase 3 | 20 | HR data protection, Reports access control, Final penetration test, Compliance validation |
6. Performance & Load Testing
Objective: Ensure system performance under load
Total Hours: 16 hours
Tools:
- Apache Bench (ab)
- Artillery
- K6
- JMeter
- Locust
Test Scenarios:
| Scenario | Target | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Normal load (100 concurrent users) | 10 minutes |
| Load Test | 1,000 concurrent users | 30 minutes |
| Stress Test | Increase until breaking point | Until failure |
| Spike Test | Sudden traffic surge (0 → 1000 users in 1 min) | 15 minutes |
| Soak Test | Sustained load (500 users) | 2 hours |
Metrics Monitored:
- Response time (p50, p95, p99)
- Error rate
- Throughput (requests per second)
- CPU utilization
- Memory utilization
- Database connections
- Cache hit rate
Performance Baseline:
- API response: < 200ms (p95)
- Database queries: < 50ms (p95)
- Page load: < 2 seconds
- App startup: < 2 seconds
7. Compatibility Testing
Web Compatibility
Browsers:
- Chrome (latest)
- Firefox (latest)
- Safari (latest)
- Edge (latest)
Devices:
- Desktop: 1920x1080, 1366x768
- Tablet: iPad, Android tablet
- Mobile: iPhone, Android phone (various sizes)
Mobile Compatibility
Android:
- Versions: 11, 12, 13, 14
- Devices: Samsung (Galaxy S21-S23), Google Pixel (6-8), Xiaomi, Huawei
iOS:
- Versions: 15, 16, 17
- Devices: iPhone 12, 13, 14, 15 (including SE and Pro Max)
8. Accessibility Testing
Objective: Ensure WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
Tools:
- WAVE (Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool)
- axe DevTools
- NVDA/JAWS screen readers (desktop)
- VoiceOver (iOS)
- TalkBack (Android)
Tests:
- Keyboard navigation (100% navigable)
- Screen reader compatibility
- Color contrast ratios (> 4.5:1)
- Alt text for all images
- ARIA attributes
- Focus indicators
- Form labels
Responsibility: QA Tester + UI/UX Designer
Frequency: Weekly + Before each milestone
Quality Gates & Milestones
Quality Gates are mandatory checkpoints that deliverables must pass before proceeding to the next phase.
Quality Gate Template
Each quality gate includes:
- Entry Criteria - Conditions required to start the gate review
- Exit Criteria - Conditions required to pass the gate
- Deliverables - Required artifacts
- Sign-off - Required approvals
Phase 1 Quality Gates
QG1.1: Backend API Foundation (Week 4)
Entry Criteria:
- All authentication APIs implemented
- Multi-tenant architecture complete
- User management APIs complete
- Unit tests written
Exit Criteria:
- API unit test coverage > 80%
- All API endpoints documented (Swagger/OpenAPI)
- Postman collection created with 100+ test cases
- Zero critical security vulnerabilities
- Multi-tenant data isolation verified (CRITICAL)
- Performance: API response < 200ms (p95)
- Code review completed
- Security review completed
Deliverables:
- Backend codebase (authentication + multi-tenant)
- API documentation
- Postman test collection
- Test coverage report
- Security scan report
Sign-off: Backend Lead, QA Tester, DevOps Engineer
QG1.2: Website Launch (Week 8)
Entry Criteria:
- All Phase 1 website pages implemented
- Responsive design complete
- SEO optimization complete
Exit Criteria:
- All pages functional across browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Mobile responsive design verified
- Lighthouse score > 90 (Performance, SEO, Accessibility)
- Page load time < 2 seconds
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance verified
- No critical or high security vulnerabilities
- Cross-browser testing completed
- Content review completed
Deliverables:
- Website codebase
- Lighthouse audit reports
- Accessibility audit report
- Cross-browser test results
Sign-off: ReactJS Lead, QA Tester, Product Owner
QG1.3: Mobile App Core (Week 12)
Entry Criteria:
- All Phase 1 mobile app screens implemented
- Authentication flow complete
- Booking flow complete
- Golden Opportunities feature complete
Exit Criteria:
- All critical user flows tested (registration, booking, payment)
- iOS and Android compatibility verified (versions 15-17 iOS, 11-14 Android)
- App startup time < 2 seconds
- No critical crashes or freezes
- Payment gateway integration tested (sandbox + production)
- Push notifications working
- Offline mode tested
- App store submission requirements met (metadata, screenshots, privacy policy)
- Security testing completed (OWASP Mobile Top 10)
Deliverables:
- Mobile app builds (iOS .ipa, Android .apk)
- Test results (functional, compatibility, performance)
- App store assets (screenshots, descriptions)
- Security audit report
Sign-off: Flutter Lead, QA Tester, Product Owner
QG1.4: Team App Core (Week 14)
Entry Criteria:
- All Phase 1 Team App screens implemented
- Staff authentication complete
- Booking management complete
- POS functionality complete
Exit Criteria:
- All staff workflows tested (check-in, session management, POS)
- iOS and Android compatibility verified
- QR code scanner functional
- POS cash drawer reconciliation tested
- Role-based access control verified
- No critical issues
- Performance acceptable on mid-range devices
Deliverables:
- Team app builds
- Test results
- User guide for staff
Sign-off: Flutter Lead, QA Tester, Operations Manager
QG1.5: KODA CORE Admin (Week 16)
Entry Criteria:
- Customer management module complete
- Reservations calendar complete
- POS module complete
- Basic dashboard complete
Exit Criteria:
- All Phase 1 KODA CORE features functional
- Customer profile with all tabs working
- Reservations calendar (drag-drop) working
- POS transaction processing tested
- Multi-tenant admin isolation verified (CRITICAL)
- Permissions system tested
- Browser compatibility verified
- Performance acceptable (large customer lists load < 3s)
- Data export (Excel, PDF) working
Deliverables:
- KODA CORE codebase
- Admin user guide
- Test results
- Performance benchmark report
Sign-off: ReactJS Lead, QA Tester, Product Owner, IT Admin
QG1.6: Phase 1 Go-Live (Week 17)
Entry Criteria:
- All Phase 1 quality gates passed
- UAT completed
- Production environment ready
- Training completed
Exit Criteria:
- All Phase 1 features accepted by stakeholders
- UAT sign-off received (> 90% approval)
- All critical and high defects resolved
- Security audit passed (zero critical vulnerabilities)
- Performance benchmarks met
- Production smoke tests passed
- Backup and disaster recovery tested
- Monitoring and alerting active
- Rollback plan documented and tested
- Support team trained
Deliverables:
- Production-ready applications (all 5: Backend, Mobile, Team, Website, CORE)
- UAT sign-off document
- Security audit report
- Performance test report
- Production readiness checklist
- Training materials
- Support documentation
Sign-off: Project Manager, Product Owner, QA Lead, DevOps Lead, Stakeholder Representative
Phase 2 Quality Gates
QG2.1: Loyalty System (Week 22)
Entry Criteria:
- Points calculation engine implemented
- Tier system implemented
- Points redemption implemented
Exit Criteria:
- Points calculation accuracy verified (100% accuracy)
- Tier progression tested
- Points redemption flow tested
- Points expiry logic tested
- Security: Points manipulation attempts blocked
- Performance: Points calculation < 100ms
Deliverables:
- Loyalty system test results
- Points calculation verification report
Sign-off: Backend Lead, QA Tester, Product Owner
QG2.2: Passport Partner System (Week 24)
Entry Criteria:
- Partner directory implemented
- QR code generation/validation implemented
- Benefit activation implemented
Exit Criteria:
- Partner directory functional
- QR code generation tested
- QR code expiry (5 minutes) verified
- Benefit activation flow tested
- Security: QR code forgery/replay attacks blocked
- Tier-based access control verified (Ambassador+ only)
Deliverables:
- Passport system test results
- Security test report (QR codes)
Sign-off: Backend Lead, Flutter Lead, QA Tester, Product Owner
QG2.3: Phase 2 Go-Live (Week 26)
Entry Criteria:
- All Phase 2 quality gates passed
- Phase 2 UAT completed
Exit Criteria:
- All Phase 2 features accepted
- UAT sign-off (> 90% approval)
- All critical/high defects resolved
- Security audit passed
- Performance benchmarks met
- Production deployment successful
Deliverables:
- Updated applications
- UAT sign-off
- Security audit report
- Deployment report
Sign-off: Project Manager, Product Owner, QA Lead
Phase 3 Quality Gates
QG3.1: HR Module (Week 30)
Entry Criteria:
- Employee management implemented
- Attendance tracking implemented
- Leave management implemented
- Payroll processing implemented
Exit Criteria:
- All HR workflows tested
- Payroll calculations verified (100% accuracy)
- Security: Payroll data protection verified
- Access control: HR data restricted to authorized users only
Deliverables:
- HR module test results
- Payroll calculation verification
- Security audit
Sign-off: ReactJS Lead, QA Tester, HR Manager
QG3.2: Reports Module (Week 32)
Entry Criteria:
- All 20+ reports implemented
- Report export functionality implemented
Exit Criteria:
- All reports tested for data accuracy
- Report filters working correctly
- Export to Excel/PDF functional
- Report generation performance < 5 seconds
- Security: Report data filtered by user permissions
Deliverables:
- Reports test results
- Data accuracy verification
- Performance test results
Sign-off: ReactJS Lead, Backend Lead, QA Tester, Finance Manager
QG3.3: KODA AI Engine (Week 34)
Entry Criteria:
- AI reports generation implemented
- WhatsApp integration implemented
- Instagram integration implemented
Exit Criteria:
- AI reports accuracy verified
- WhatsApp bot response accuracy > 80%
- Instagram bot response accuracy > 80%
- AI knowledge base tested
- API rate limiting tested
- Security: AI API authentication verified
Deliverables:
- AI engine test results
- Bot accuracy reports
- API test results
Sign-off: Backend Lead (AI), QA Tester, Marketing Manager
QG3.4: Complete System Integration (Week 35)
Entry Criteria:
- All 7 applications deployed
- All integrations complete
Exit Criteria:
- End-to-end user journey tested (customer discovery → booking → session → loyalty)
- Data syncs across all applications verified
- WebSocket real-time updates working
- Multi-tenant isolation verified across all apps (CRITICAL)
- Performance: 1000+ concurrent users supported
- Load test passed (30-minute sustained load)
- Accessibility: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance verified
Deliverables:
- E2E test results
- Performance test report
- Load test report
- Accessibility audit report
Sign-off: All Tech Leads, QA Lead, DevOps Lead
QG3.5: Production Readiness & Final Launch (Week 36)
Entry Criteria:
- All Phase 3 quality gates passed
- Final UAT completed
- Production environment fully configured
Exit Criteria:
- All features accepted by stakeholders
- Final UAT sign-off (> 90% approval)
- Zero critical defects, < 5 high defects
- Final security audit passed (comprehensive)
- Compliance validation complete (GDPR, PCI DSS if applicable)
- Performance benchmarks met
- Production smoke tests passed
- Monitoring and alerting validated
- Backup/restore tested
- Disaster recovery plan validated
- Rollback plan tested
- Support team trained
- Documentation complete
Deliverables:
- Production-ready complete system (all 7 applications)
- Final UAT sign-off
- Final security audit report
- Compliance certification (if applicable)
- Final performance test report
- Production readiness checklist (completed)
- Complete documentation set
- Training completion certificates
Sign-off: Project Manager, Product Owner, QA Lead, DevOps Lead, Security Lead, All Stakeholder Representatives
Document Approval
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Manager | |||
| QA Lead | |||
| Backend Lead | |||
| Frontend Lead | |||
| Mobile Lead | |||
| DevOps Lead | |||
| Product Owner |